Apparently, loving people is a crime
Written by Frank Yonkof Sunday, 07 March 2010 20:52
The “animal rights” community was certainly unhappy with my column last week (“Humans always come before animals,” March 1) when I stated that I would never donate money to an animal shelter because I would much rather donate to human causes.It provided good entertainment as one girl compared me to “Hitler, Stalin and Caesar” before claiming my editors should be “euthanized” for printing such a view, that a human life is more precious than that of an animal.
But the most entertaining response came from fellow columnist Thisanjali Gangoda (“Humans are animals…,”March 4), who was not too happy with the fact that human beings come first in my book.
“Once again, Mr. Yonkof has proved to be insensitive, illogical and one-sided in framing his arguments, this time about why animals are less worthy creatures than humans.”
I suspect that she jumped to conclusions about things I simply never said.
For the record, I never discouraged people from donating to animal shelters. Why? Because I really don’t care if they do or don’t.
I’ll be the first to admit that I’m passionate about my opinions and have no problem putting them out there. But at the end of the day, I rarely (if ever) claim my ideas are the “truth.” I’m just here to provide my worldview on things. And no one is forcing Gangoda to read my columns, especially when I have never finished reading any of hers.
What I did discourage in that last column, however, is the mindset that humans and animals are on the same level. It’s a sad, sad day when a self proclaimed “human rights activist” cannot stand up for the basic right that human beings, while never perfect, deserve to be treated with more respect than an animal.
What I did not say was that animal abuse is justifiable in any way. Surely people are responsible for the animals they choose to own, and I would never kick a puppy because it was in my way. But if I had to choose between saving a child or a kitten from a fire, I would surely save the kid.
I thought everyone would do the same. But apparently, I was mistaken.
Gangoda is living in a Disney fairy tale when she makes statements on how animals and people are “one of the same.” Even better, “No two causes are alike and no one cause trumps another in importance.” So I guess the Facebook group “Bring back Saved by the Bell” is just as legitimate as the Make a Wish Foundation?
To be quite honest, I’m not upset that Gangoda chose to attack my column. If she was in one of my classes, I would have no problem making friendly conversation with her. I guess I was more disappointed she missed the main point of my column: Some people give more respect to animals than they do to people.
Was it really fair for someone on KentWired.com to claim that my editors should be “euthanized” because I simply wrote an opinion she didn’t like? I know online commentators are sometimes unbalanced, but talking about killing a human because I refuse to donate to an animal shelter?
It goes to show you that a column can be taken wildly out of context. The idea was simple, but in the end, it proved too simple for many to handle, and everyone was analyzing what I supposedly stopped short of saying.
I think after two weeks of back and fourth snickering, people are tired of all this ForumpPage drama. Lord knows those Thursday girls are crazy, and I for one am looking forward to getting back to talking about less controversial topics like politics and religion.
Frank Yonkof is a sophomore newspaper journalism major and columnist for the Daily Kent Stater. Contact him at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
Comments (6)

written by Alia Awadallah, March 10, 2010
I completely agree with you Frank, and the comments here again misinterpret what you say. Frank isn't saying he would never save an animal, and I'm sure he would, but he has his priorities straight. Honestly, if there was a flood or earthquake and you could rescue either people or animals, would you people choose animals? Animals should be treated with respect, but when it comes down to it humans do and should take priority. Come off of your ridiculous arguments, all of you know you would do the same if it was humans vs animals.
written by MolecularFossils, March 09, 2010
"Was it really fair for someone on KentWired.com to claim that my editors should be “euthanized” because I simply wrote an opinion she didn’t like? I know online commentators are sometimes unbalanced, but talking about killing a human because I refuse to donate to an animal shelter? "
You're being dishonest, Frank. The commenter said your editors should be "theoretically euthanized." I assume they mean "metaphorically", especially since they were talking about in the previous paragraph.
"Mr. Konkof can be dismissed because he is just a kid starting his education. His editors should be theoretically euthanized for printing such dreg sans disclaimer."
And the premise of your argument is based on a false dichotomy. You don't have to only donate to one cause or another, in fact many people routinely do both. You supply no evidence to support any of your claims except anecdotes and worthless thought experiments.
Furthermore, Thisanjali is absolutely correct when she pointed out that humans are animals. We're primates, and the fact of evolution illuminates our common ancestry with all other life on the planet. If Neandertal, or an Australopithecine was still around today, we'd have an even more gradual transition between us and the other apes. What we ought to be concerned with is the amount of suffering caused or relieved by our actions.
You're being dishonest, Frank. The commenter said your editors should be "theoretically euthanized." I assume they mean "metaphorically", especially since they were talking about in the previous paragraph.
"Mr. Konkof can be dismissed because he is just a kid starting his education. His editors should be theoretically euthanized for printing such dreg sans disclaimer."
And the premise of your argument is based on a false dichotomy. You don't have to only donate to one cause or another, in fact many people routinely do both. You supply no evidence to support any of your claims except anecdotes and worthless thought experiments.
Furthermore, Thisanjali is absolutely correct when she pointed out that humans are animals. We're primates, and the fact of evolution illuminates our common ancestry with all other life on the planet. If Neandertal, or an Australopithecine was still around today, we'd have an even more gradual transition between us and the other apes. What we ought to be concerned with is the amount of suffering caused or relieved by our actions.
written by Manas, March 08, 2010
Shame on Kent Stater for publishing another piece of self obsessed crap.
Yonkof, you cannot be a serious journalist until you put the Bible away.
Yonkof, you cannot be a serious journalist until you put the Bible away.
written by Lat, March 08, 2010
Even after you had two tries to get your point across I still feel like you have failed. You have no support for your argument. I don't feel like you even have an argument.
Yeah it sucks when people put their pets before their children. But... That's it. That's all there is to it. It sucks and it should be stopped. But because of that fact alone you're saying you would never help an animal in distress?
Ridiculous.
Humans feel pain. People get hurt. People need help. And people need to be loved.
Animals feel pain too. Animals get hurt too. Animals need help (especially since they can't help themselves in this world). And animals need to be loved too.
I see a lot in common there...
I also have a question for you personally Frank. Have you ever volunteered at a soup kitchen? Have you ever donated a substantial sum of money to some organization that is set up to help people? Do you consider a donation of $5 as "good enough"?
Before you argue that humans should be put before animals, how about you dedicate your time and resources to that cause. Instead of complaining in your little article.
Have a nice day.
Yeah it sucks when people put their pets before their children. But... That's it. That's all there is to it. It sucks and it should be stopped. But because of that fact alone you're saying you would never help an animal in distress?
Ridiculous.
Humans feel pain. People get hurt. People need help. And people need to be loved.
Animals feel pain too. Animals get hurt too. Animals need help (especially since they can't help themselves in this world). And animals need to be loved too.
I see a lot in common there...
I also have a question for you personally Frank. Have you ever volunteered at a soup kitchen? Have you ever donated a substantial sum of money to some organization that is set up to help people? Do you consider a donation of $5 as "good enough"?
Before you argue that humans should be put before animals, how about you dedicate your time and resources to that cause. Instead of complaining in your little article.
Have a nice day.
written by achilles, March 08, 2010
Wow, Frankie!
Having someone refer to you as something akin to "Hitler, Stalin or Caesar" must have been crushing...how ever have you been able to carry on? Almost makes me wish I'd never referred to certain folk as "management-weenie or stuporvisor/stupidintendent or thieving prick".
Not! I'll see if I can get you into the next blessing line-up for 'St. Francis of Assisi-day', dawg, kowtowing to the "powers-that-be" being what it is and all, eh?
Having someone refer to you as something akin to "Hitler, Stalin or Caesar" must have been crushing...how ever have you been able to carry on? Almost makes me wish I'd never referred to certain folk as "management-weenie or stuporvisor/stupidintendent or thieving prick".
Not! I'll see if I can get you into the next blessing line-up for 'St. Francis of Assisi-day', dawg, kowtowing to the "powers-that-be" being what it is and all, eh?
Write comment








Hey, Frankie? Got any idea as to why the University continues spending tuition/tax dollars subsidizing it's Athletic Department, supposedly a self-supporting auxiliary unit of same akin to Residence Services, as opposed to the likes of Kent State United for Biloxi/the Gulf or the Campus chapter of Habitat for Humanity or the local Food Bank or the ACS Relay for Life???