The independent news website of The Kent Stater & TV2

KentWired

The independent news website of The Kent Stater & TV2

KentWired

The independent news website of The Kent Stater & TV2

KentWired

Follow KentWired on Instagram
Today’s Events

Proposed CAMPUS Act addresses campus safety and protests

The+Friends+of+Palestine+Collective+protests+every+Friday+at+the+downtown+gazebo.
Michael Neenan
The Friends of Palestine Collective protests every Friday at the downtown gazebo.

The Ohio Legislature proposed House Bill 606, also known as the Campus Accountability and Modernization to Protect University Students Act, to provide Ohio universities with additional safety resources for student protests.

The proposal of the CAMPUS Act comes as universities issue safety guidances for the increased number of campus protests and encampments following the Israel-Hamas war. 

If passed, the CAMPUS Act will require universities to train administration, faculty and staff on how to respond to hate incidents and will allow individuals to report those incidents anonymously.

Benjamin Kronenberg, a senior music education major and organizer of the Friends of Palestine Collective protests, said students’ safety has become at risk.

Rachel Felber, executive director of Hillel, a Jewish organization found on college campuses, said it is important for individuals to have access to reporting hate incidents, but also to create a safe space where individuals do not have to fear retaliation coming from their report.

Jewish students, she added, have expressed feeling vulnerable and unsafe on campus.

“[They] found that Hillel is one of, if not the only place which they can be who they truly are without having to hide a piece of them in order to be safe,” she said.

Kronenberg said they did not agree with the language of the bill because it focuses primarily on antisemitism compared to other forms of hate speech.

“[I] am very, very worried that this bill might give police, politicians, whoever, the power to send police, send security to pro-Palestine rallies under the guise of it being antisemitic,’’ they said. 

Yazun Issawi, a junior computer information systems major and president of Students for Justice in Palestine, agreed that the CAMPUS Act emphasizes antisemitism more than other forms of discrimination mentioned in the bill.

“I feel that is inherently discriminating against other forms of discrimination,” he said. “I believe that if you want to protect a certain group, then you have to protect all of the groups.”

Because the CAMPUS Act was referred to the Ohio House Finance Committee and is still pending legislation, Eric Mansfield, the university’s assistant vice president for content strategy and communications, said the university had no comment.

The CAMPUS Act looks to strengthen the relationship between universities and local law enforcement. Felber said she hopes the bill will provide funding for organizations to have access to security from campus police and other law enforcement.

This past year, Hillel received emergency funding to secure the organization and its members, Felber said.

“Had we not received that funding, we would have had to think more strictly about the way our programs operated,” Felber said.

Kronenberg said the CAMPUS Act should include known repercussions for the police inciting violence and having a security system in place. 

“I think that we can hope for a day when we call for help, we actually get help,” they said.

The CAMPUS Act would require universities to publicize information pertaining to protests like time, place and manner restrictions established by neutral criteria.

Issawi said these restrictions do not take into account protests that may occur on short notice like encampments. Because these are not considered, Issawi said he is unsure how law enforcement may respond.

“If anyone were to break these rules, it would give them a reason to use brute force to shut them down,” he said.

Although Issawi said he did not agree with all aspects of the proposed bill, he said its focus on protecting students’ rights and their safety is important to prioritize.

“I think this bill should only be put in place to protect that right to free speech and to protect these students from outside agitators,” he said.

If the CAMPUS Act is passed, Ohio universities will have to:

  • Provide administration, faculty and staff with training on responding to hate incidents.
  • Establish a procedure for investigating students’ reports on racial, religious or ethnic bias harassment or intimidation.
  • Require the creation of a uniform reporting system on hate incidents. 
  • Submit an annual report of hate incidents to the chancellor, the attorney general and the United States attorneys for the northern and southern districts of Ohio.
  • Organize a campus task force to combat forms of hate. 
  • Found a committee on how to combat hate by creating guidance on its prevention.
  • Form a partnership between university police, local law enforcement and highway patrol to provide student groups facing threats with security.
  • Publicize time, place and manner restrictions of protests.

Adriana Gasiewski is a reporter. Contact her at [email protected].

View Comments (1)
More to Discover
About the Contributors
Adriana Gasiewski, Staff Reporter
Adriana is a junior journalism major with minors in English and Italian. Previously, she was a staff reporter and the cultural and diversity beat reporter. Outside of KentWired, she is a web writer and the partnership coordinator for Her Campus at Kent State. She enjoys writing about the Kent community and current events. Contact her at [email protected].
Michael Neenan, General Assignment Reporter
Michael is a senior journalism major with a public relations minor. He works as a reporter, covering topics from sports to university administration. Contact him at [email protected]

Comments (1)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • B

    Barry DunietzJun 14, 2024 at 4:49 pm

    Readership must be informed of the SJP agenda, especially when discussing concerns of overprotection from antisemitism. The irony is screaming at us.

    Some facts about SJP: The Anti-Defamation League and the Brandeis Center called university presidents to investigate local SJP chapters. In Florida, SJP chapters have been deactivated. In other campuses SJP chapters were temporarily suspended from fear of further polarization inflicted within the campus community.

    In their letter to the presidents the ADL addresses a toolkit sent by the national SJP committee to local chapters, where the Hamas October 7 attacks are praised, described as a “historic win for the Palestinian resistance.”

    However, the same praised attack has triggered a war between Hamas and Israel that continues to cost in human lives. Praising this assault clearly does not help the Gazan people. Hamas will not surrender position of power in Gaza nor return kidnapped hostages and therefore we are still not seeing a ceasefire being agreed upon. Should not all who care about
    the Palestinian lives call against the continued grip of Hamas on the Gazan people? Interestingly the same toolkit addresses USA campuses
    as located in the occupied Turtle Island — what does this imply with
    regard to calls for resistance to the U.S.A government? (Anyone who is
    interested to further learn about this toolkit can find it online, unfortunately)

    True pro-Palestinian voices would call to replace Hamas as the governing power in Gaza. Only, such pro-Palestinian voices will d good for all, besides for the Hamas… Can we please hear more of these voices? (Yes, search Hamza Howidy, for example)

    Reply