Half the books are checking out permanently
Written by Frank Yonkof Wednesday, 22 September 2010 20:57
The average book in an academic research library is only checked out once every 50 years.
That is why Library Dean James Bracken is looking to reduce the library’s in-house collection by 50 percent.
As Bracken walked the shelves of the library Tuesday afternoon, he pointed to two books, Margaret Warner Morley's "A Song of Life," printed in 1891. Both copies have never been checked out.
The university plans to reduce the 2.9 million volume collection at a rate of 5 percent per year over the next decade, which gives students more study space in the upper floors, among other places.
“We want to create an environment that students want to come in, as opposed to need to come in," Bracken said. “There’s not space for that right now.”
The Special Collections won't be removed, but Bracken is currently looking for display cases to exhibit the collection on the first floor.
The books will be sent to OhioLINK, the state's book consortium that shares 48 million books with 88 university and college libraries. Students could still request all of the materials housed on site and items would be delivered within a week.
OhioLINK keeps at least two copies of every book in the state. Additional copies of the books are donated to Better World Books, which distributes them to universities in Africa, Bracken said.
A study conducted by OhioLINK found that 6.5 percent of an academic research library's collection accounts for 93.5 percent of the public’s total use.
Bracken estimates that 25 percent of the collection has never been used, which will be the first wave to go. After that, the Faculty Senate's Library Committee will weigh in with suggestions on how to proceed.
"We're going to find books up here that have never ever, ever, ever been used," Bracken said. "So for the first five years, no one is going to see that, and it's not going to impact anybody."
During the library's second floor renovation during the summer of 2007, a portion of the periodical section was condensed to make room for a study area with tables and armchairs.
“It was almost a pilot of what we’re doing for the larger project,” said Joe Salem, head of the Reference Services Department. "Everything in that area is always used. Period."
| Meet James Bracken The man President Lefton hired over the summer to optimize the library has experience in reducing collections. Before starting on Aug. 2, Bracken was the assistant director of Ohio State University's library and oversaw their $109 million renovation. At Ohio State, Bracken was able to reduce 2.5 million volumes to 1.25 million volumes. Before the renovation, Ohio State’s main library saw about 3,000 students per day. After completion, daily attendance jumped to 12,000. “The Ohio State library was a tremendous accomplishment,” Bracken said. "But we didn’t do enough. We left too much of the collection there.” By the numbers 50 years - average book checkout for a library like ours 2.9 million – volumes in the University Library 25 percent – of books in the University Library have never been read 6.5 percent - of books account for 93.5 percent of the public’s total use |
It's common for university libraries to reduce their collections, Salem said. A library the size of Kent routinely withdraws 75,000 to 100,000 items a year, Bracken said. Kent State has been downsizing its collection for the past six years, but now plans to speed up the process. “All libraries weed collections,” Bracken said. “The fact is, as materials become obsolete, you discard them. You withdraw them.” Unlike their university counterparts, most public libraries constantly reduce their collections to make room for new items. Reed Memorial Library in Ravenna weeds books that haven't been checked out in three years, although there are some exceptions, said Cass Owens, director of the Reed Memorial Library. “I’m a book lover," Bracken said. "My training is a rare book librarian. I want to have more books. “But when books crowd people out of the building and they’re not used, you have to ask yourself the question, ‘Are there better ways to bring people back into the library to use the books we have?’” President Lester Lefton has given Bracken the task of raising $10 million for a larger renovation project that would take place over the next 10 to 20 years to reorganize the library and replace aging infrastructure. The university architects are finishing a space-utilization study that would help them come up with a long-range plan for future renovations. At first, they will plan the ideal library. Most likely, they will pick the most important projects to fund. "If we were to do everything that we wanted to right now, it likely would approach $100 million," University Architect Michael Bruder said. "That's a very, very tough thing to get funded." Because they’re still in the early stages of planning, there is no way to estimate the final cost. Either way, funding for most of the library renovations will not come from the $250 million renovations budget the university currently has. Before plans are made, Bracken hopes to have lunch with students to get their opinion on the renovations. Upcoming dates for “Pizza with the Dean” include Oct. 22 and Nov. 3. Students can sign up on the library’s website. Contact Frank Yonkof at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .
Comments (10)

written by General principle, October 12, 2010
I just want to say how much I love how Kent State is creating excellence inaction!
Getting rid of half of our books, cutting departmental budgets and raising tuition! Education is priority number 1 at Kent State University.
But it doesn't just stop there! The University also gets to build a $3.5 million new clocktower in an area no one goes by! They also take pictures of your face and put them up on buildings without permission!
And with non-confrontational student media that sucks up to the administration every chance they get, what's not to love?
So I just wanted to congratulate Kent State and say awesome show, great job!
Getting rid of half of our books, cutting departmental budgets and raising tuition! Education is priority number 1 at Kent State University.
But it doesn't just stop there! The University also gets to build a $3.5 million new clocktower in an area no one goes by! They also take pictures of your face and put them up on buildings without permission!
And with non-confrontational student media that sucks up to the administration every chance they get, what's not to love?
So I just wanted to congratulate Kent State and say awesome show, great job!
written by Patricia Martin, October 12, 2010
How does he know that the items have never been used? Is he using circulation as the only measure? What if people actually come to the library and read on site? Is that not a "use" of the book? Seems like his measures are a bit narrow.
written by Jeannine, September 29, 2010
I, too, am a browser. I can't even begin to count how many times I found books for my research papers by just browsing. I realize we're becoming a more wired world but there will always be the research paper (or, occasionally, the annotated bibliography) no matter what happens to library demand. I have to agree that the library was one of the few places left at KSU that had some redeeming qualities but that looks like that's disappearing. I have to admit that I have been in various academic libraries & I can't say that I was all that impressed with it (some of the other academic libraries I have been in were far better). I have to wonder what this means for how today's students will do on the research paper or the annotated bibliography.
written by english grad student, September 28, 2010
i forgot: i do agree that it would be a great idea to have a book sale. this might take a lot of coordination with ohiolink though, because selling books to students who won't ever use them as opposed to giving them to ohiolink isn't too smart, so maybe only duplicate copies of books could be sold?
written by english grad student, September 28, 2010
i love books as much as anybody (probably more than most people), but weeding out library collections to make room for other things isn't going to ruin the world. i do agree that the library is one of ksu's main redeeming qualities, but it's not as if the books they're getting rid of are going to be destroyed. they're being sent to ohiolink so they can be USED - that's their function!
i know how much fun it can be to stroll through the aisles and browse all kinds of books i didn't even know existed, but we'll still be able to do that; plus there are also many other libraries where you can do that too.
when they start thinning the collections you probably won't even notice. in fact, they'll probably be journals from my field that get scrapped first, so what will i do? get pdf's online, buy them, or order them from ohiolink. you couldn't do that with the ancient texts you're describing, so of course it's wonderful and amazing they've survived so long and were saved...but this is thousands of years later, and all those works are probably digitized too. don't get me wrong, i like writing in the margins of my books, dog-earing the pages, etc., but the earth won't stop spinning just because we'll only have ONE copy of morley's "a song of life" now.
also, you have to remember that while "knowledge as a legacy" is nice in theory, universities are businesses first and foremost. they need to make money, and that's their number one goal. unfortunately, education is only #2.
i know how much fun it can be to stroll through the aisles and browse all kinds of books i didn't even know existed, but we'll still be able to do that; plus there are also many other libraries where you can do that too.
when they start thinning the collections you probably won't even notice. in fact, they'll probably be journals from my field that get scrapped first, so what will i do? get pdf's online, buy them, or order them from ohiolink. you couldn't do that with the ancient texts you're describing, so of course it's wonderful and amazing they've survived so long and were saved...but this is thousands of years later, and all those works are probably digitized too. don't get me wrong, i like writing in the margins of my books, dog-earing the pages, etc., but the earth won't stop spinning just because we'll only have ONE copy of morley's "a song of life" now.
also, you have to remember that while "knowledge as a legacy" is nice in theory, universities are businesses first and foremost. they need to make money, and that's their number one goal. unfortunately, education is only #2.
written by Jason Stuart, September 28, 2010
I don't see the problem with this. As quoted in the article, librarians weed collections. The idea behind weeding is to establish space priorities. That is what means to be healthy. If 25% of the books are never being used, than it makes sense to get rid of them in favor of something useful.
The KSU library's mission is to serve the curriculum of the school, not preserve works for posterity. Let someone else do that. It isn't like they are destroying the books either, but sending them off to others who might want them. What is wrong with that?
To comment on the previous post, Plato and such were preserved because someone found them valuable. The communities that preserved them, whether in the Middle East or Europe, did so because they recognized the worth of the works, just as we do today. Plenty of materials were lost to antiquity, and plenty more from our time will be as well. Many from the 20th century are virtually extinct already, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. Love it or hate it, the test of time is a natural weeding process that is part of our reality.
The KSU library's mission is to serve the curriculum of the school, not preserve works for posterity. Let someone else do that. It isn't like they are destroying the books either, but sending them off to others who might want them. What is wrong with that?
To comment on the previous post, Plato and such were preserved because someone found them valuable. The communities that preserved them, whether in the Middle East or Europe, did so because they recognized the worth of the works, just as we do today. Plenty of materials were lost to antiquity, and plenty more from our time will be as well. Many from the 20th century are virtually extinct already, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. Love it or hate it, the test of time is a natural weeding process that is part of our reality.
written by Graham, September 26, 2010
I wonder if it is possible for the library to allocate some funds to digitize these older, less/unused books in addition to making room for new tomes?
written by Kent State Grad, September 23, 2010
Haha, this is interesting. A library is better if it contains fewer books.
written by Caitlin Binkhorst, September 23, 2010
There is only one reason why the writings of Plato and ancient works are still with us. These works were kept in libraries of the Romans and then copied by hand by monks throughout the middle ages. They were kept in the libraries of monasteries where some still remain to this day. The beautiful illuminated, gloss bibles of the Gothic Age remain only because they were kept in libraries. I am sure that most of these books went unread for years, decades, maybe even centuries but that did not lead to them being destroyed to simply reduce the size of the collection of the library. In older times, libraries were much more important than they are today, because libraries were the knowledge storehouses of the community.
Kent State's library is one of its few redeeming features. I enjoy going in, looking through the stacks, reading passages, and looking at pictures. As an Art History major, I know how valuable these books are to education. The volumes on the History of Florence may not have been checked out many times, but they are still invaluable ways to learn about the city's historic origins.
If books are present in the library and i need a book about a certain subject, i can just glance thru the shelves, find the book i need, then scan through it to make sure its what i really need. However, if these books are not available at the library and they have to be ordered through Ohiolink, then i have to wait till the book comes into he library and hope it has the material that i need. The article in the Kent Stater says that the main reason for the reduction is, "We want people to want to come in, as opposed to need to come in, There's not space for that right now." If this statement is true, maybe people only come in when they have to due to the poor organizational strategies on display in the library. If the study space was relocated or distributed between floors better, there would be more room for book storage and people would be more likely to enjoy their experience at the library.
If the collection must be reduced, why not hold a campus wide book sale to try to raise money to improve something in the library rather than just shipping the books away.
Don't make the decision to get rid of these books so hastily, this is a university, and knowledge is our legacy.
Kent State's library is one of its few redeeming features. I enjoy going in, looking through the stacks, reading passages, and looking at pictures. As an Art History major, I know how valuable these books are to education. The volumes on the History of Florence may not have been checked out many times, but they are still invaluable ways to learn about the city's historic origins.
If books are present in the library and i need a book about a certain subject, i can just glance thru the shelves, find the book i need, then scan through it to make sure its what i really need. However, if these books are not available at the library and they have to be ordered through Ohiolink, then i have to wait till the book comes into he library and hope it has the material that i need. The article in the Kent Stater says that the main reason for the reduction is, "We want people to want to come in, as opposed to need to come in, There's not space for that right now." If this statement is true, maybe people only come in when they have to due to the poor organizational strategies on display in the library. If the study space was relocated or distributed between floors better, there would be more room for book storage and people would be more likely to enjoy their experience at the library.
If the collection must be reduced, why not hold a campus wide book sale to try to raise money to improve something in the library rather than just shipping the books away.
Don't make the decision to get rid of these books so hastily, this is a university, and knowledge is our legacy.
Write comment




Furthermore, what about the enjoyment of having a QUIET place to go study, not a social club? There is plenty of space in the library. It's true that the upper floors tend to be empty of people from time to time, but it's a big library. This, then, is not an unreasonable result. It's also a relief. The "friendly" space downstairs is far too buzzing with activity/noise/conversation to be conducive to doing actual work. A space that students "want" to come, as opposed to "need" to come, would better serve the student body in the Student Center.
Also, having only one copy of a book won’t satisfy classroom assignment/term paper demands -- and neither will the additional two books available on OhioLINK. Another concern is that two OhioLINK books will rapidly be ruined through over use. I'm not a fan of waiting up to receive a book from OhioLINK and then having the binding fall apart as I try to read it.
Finally, while I understand that universities have to run like a business, it's a bit much to privatize the LIBRARY. How does Bracken plan to raise this money he was hired to raise?
I cannot believe this has not been made a bigger issue. Although, I guess if they are trying to make money, they want to attract people to the library who will spend more time drinking Starbucks coffee and eating pastries than actually looking through books anyway.